Grace and Compassion

by mikestroope | January 4th, 2010 | Uncategorized | No Comments

As I begin 2010, I am overwhelmed by God’s grace and compassion.

I may at times think myself as wholly good, kind, and benevolent, but I know who I really am. Many times I justify or defend my actions and responses, but my motives are quite clear to me. I am capable of lies and thus at times seek to deceive, but the truth seems to find me out. While I may be a man who tries to do good, love others, and live the truth, I fall short and thus must continually look to and rely upon the grace and compassion of God.

Read more…

Renovate – Educate

by mikestroope | November 14th, 2009 | Church, Formation, Mission | No Comments

For the majority of Christians, church and missions operate in separate and distinct realms. The church nurtures and instructs the ’saved’, and missionaries cross cultures and evangelize the ‘heathen’. Church is here and familiar, missions is over there and foreign. The points at which church and missions usually connect are money and recruitment. Because the work of missions requires money and fresh recruits and since the church is where both can be found, mission organizations and agencies find it necessary to relate to the church. Likewise, since people within the church have full-time, secular jobs, they ‘do missions’ by providing finances for those who do the work of ‘fulltime’ missions.

Read more…

Buffered Self

by mikestroope | October 30th, 2009 | Change, Formation | No Comments

Everyday, in large and small ways, each of us are making decisions – real decisions with real consequences. No matter how hard we might try to rationalize choices, blame others, see ourselves as victim, or fain ignorance, we make these decisions ourselves and our choices impact the lives of people around us in either cruel or kind ways.

Read more…

Viva la Revolucion!

by mikestroope | October 26th, 2009 | Change, Church, Formation, Mission | No Comments

A revolution is taking place right before our eyes – a mission revolution. Some might mistake it to be a rebellion against power and authority, but such a characterization would be wrong. A rebellion is an attempt to overthrow and unseat, while a revolution is the act of re-creating or re-forming from the bottom up. Rebellion takes place in the halls of power, revolution takes to the streets. Over coffee at Starbuck, on airplanes returning from Niger, in church offices, and at small gatherings, ‘like-hearted’ pastors and church folk are joining passions and resources into mission collectives.

Read more…

These Answers

by mikestroope | October 24th, 2009 | Change, Church, Formation | No Comments

Even though I am driven by particular questions, I am not without answers. I open my hands toward what I do not know, and at the same time, I stand firmly in what I do know. For example …

Read more…

Those Questions

by mikestroope | October 23rd, 2009 | Change, Formation, Mission | No Comments

There are a number of questions that I continue to ask, that still drive me. Some of you will wonder what is wrong with me. You ask – Why are you still asking questions? Don’t you have things figured out yet? Well, I keep asking because the given answers just don’t fit or are no longer clear. For example …

Read more…

Brilliance and Beauty

by mikestroope | October 9th, 2009 | Change, Formation | No Comments

Michel de Montaigne (1533-92) comments …

Since it is the privilege of the mind to rescue itself from old age, I advise mine to do so as strongly as I can. Let it grow green, let it flourish meanwhile, if it can, like mistletoe on a dead tree. But I fear it is a traitor. It has such a tight brotherly bond with the body that it abandons me at every turn to follow the body in its need. I take it aside and flatter it, I work on it, all for nothing. In vain I try to turn it aside from from this bond, I offer it Seneca and Catullus, and the ladies and the royal dances; if its companion has the colic, it seems to have it too. Even the activities that are peculiarly its own cannot be aroused; they evidently smack of a cold in the head. There is not sprightliness in [the mind's] productions if there is none in the body at the same time. (cited in S. Toulmin, Cosmopolis, 38)

Read more…

No Partiality!

by mikestroope | September 21st, 2009 | Culture, Formation, Mission | No Comments

A culture of abuse and slander swirls around us and seeks to poison our view of the world. Via the internet, television, printed materials – from politicians, talk show hosts, good ole boys, and even well-meaning people – we are told that Muslims, Democrats, homosexuals, illegal aliens, and others are less than human, represent the dregs of society, and are not worthy to live. In shrill tones, these voices shout – Fear! Protect! Attack!

As disciples of Jesus Christ, we must resist these voices and hold fast to an alternative vision. Instead, the voice of Jesus must order our words and actions – “whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also” … “love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” (Mt 5:40, 44). Jesus did more than speak these words, he lived them by touching lepers, speaking to women, embracing Samaritans, loving those on the margins, and suffering death on the cross.

The Jesus way confronted Peter. A lifetime of religious instruction and cultural reinforcement had taught him to hate, despise, and dismiss the Romans. And yet, God revealed to Peter another way – love and inclusion. Peter is confronted with a choice – either abandon his prejudice or deny God’s acceptance of Cornelius (Acts 10). In the end, Peter declares, “Truly I perceive that God shows no partiality!”

I can disagree with another and even be on the opposite side of an issue, but the gospel does not allow me to slander, curse, strike or kill another human being. If I slander or demonize another person, be they Republican or Democrat, Jew or Muslims, black or white, poor or immigrant (legal or illegal), homosexual or disabled, then I deny the gospel. For the gospel of Jesus Christ …

* is powerful enough to transform anyone – “it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek.” (Rom 1:16)
* is for the whole world – “For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.” (Jn 3:16)
* unifies people – “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male or female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Gal. 3:28)
* creates a new humanity – “a multitude which no one could count, from every nation, all tribes and peoples and tongues, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, clothed in white robes, … and they cry out with a loud voice, saying, ‘Salvation to our God who sits on the throne and to the Lamb” (Rev. 7:9, 10)

The gospel destroys the walls that separate the people. As the people of God, we are called to join him in the ministry of wall-demolition. For you see, while we were enemies of God, Christ showed no partiality toward us; rather he died for our sins and made a way for us to know him, his love and grace. We serve his mission not through venom, hate, exclusion, slander, curses or self-preservation but by laying down our lives for the other. This is the gospel – may we have courage to speak and live it in the midst of a polarized and uncivil society!

The Mission of God

by mikestroope | September 16th, 2009 | Uncategorized | 5 Comments

I am reading for the third time Christopher J. H. Wright’s The Mission of God: Unlocking the Bible’s Grand Narrative (2006). As I read through the first section this morning, I recalled how Wright’s reframing of mission first impacted me in 2006.  My comment at that time was that he turned my biblical/theological understanding of mission on its head – the way I look at scripture and how I talk about mission could never be the same.  I do not agree with Wright at every point, and yet, I wholeheartedly affirm the manner in which he approaches the Bible and mission and the fresh, holistic understanding of mission he offers the church.

It is extremely urgent that the church reexamine its encounter with the world and rethink how it is to participate in God’s mission.  If you have not read Wright, take the time to work through this tome (535 pages of text).  I know some of you have purchased The Mission of God, and it sits on your shelf, partially or totally unread (because I have seen it sitting there).  Pull it down, open it up, and begin working your way carefully and thoughtfully through each section.  Of all the things you might do in the next six months, reading Wright might be the most formative and impactful.

… and then the end will come.

by mikestroope | September 9th, 2009 | Church, Formation, Mission | 5 Comments

It’s Sunday morning.  A man rises and reads the following text:

This gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all the nations, and then the end will come (Matt. 24:14).

The speaker then exhorts his hearers to do missions in order that they might hasten the return of the Lord. They are told that through missionary activity they can actually accelerate or speed up Christ’s return.  Since every sincere Christian wants to see Christ return as quickly as possible, it makes logical sense that they should be involved in missions.  In fact, they are told that one of them could possibly be the actual person who preaches the gospel to the last people group and thus initiate the Second Coming.

While this may be a popular interpretation of Jesus’ words and seems to be a persuasive reason for missionary service, several questions need to be raised …

Will we actually cause Christ to return? The implication is that in some logical, mechanistic manner we trigger or force God to bring human history to a close.  Rather than merely living in the expectation of his coming and being acted upon by his return, we stand above this event in a controlling, initiating manner.  On the contrary, Jesus is not issuing a command or prescribing a strategy.  He is stating a fact – “the gospel of the kingdom shall be preached.”  God will return when he decides to do so and will conclude human history for reasons that are far beyond our comprehension or control.  Thus, it seems unwise for any of us to obligate God to a timetable conditioned by our actions.

Doesn’t such an interpretation encourage escapism? The message is – the world is evil, you want to get out of it as soon as you can, and therefore, do yourself a favor by doing missions.  And yet, in the preceding verses, Jesus encourages his disciples to do just the opposite.  Even though things will become harder and harder before the end, Jesus tells them to remain firm and faithful in the present, evil age.  It seems that an appeal to do missions in order to bring about the end may have more to do with our desire to escape suffering than the redemption of the world.

What constitutes ‘the whole world’? It seems the speaker makes clear what Jesus has left unclear.  Does ‘the whole world’ mean all geo-political entities (nations), ethno-linguistic groups, dialects, cultures, provinces, cities, or villages?  Must these be 25%, 45%, or 65% evangelized or Christianized?  Do each of these portions of the world have to have one or two churches, a group of churches, or a ‘church planting movement’ before Jesus returns?  Do these churches have to be self-supporting, self-governing, and self-propagating?  In my lifetime, I have seen various definitions of ‘the whole world’ come and go.  What is now in vogue will surely be replaced with a fresh explanation.  Jesus does not give specifics at this point, and thus, it seems unwise for any of us to speak in quantifiable absolutes about what will precipitate his return.

What does it mean that the gospel of the kingdom will be preached? The speaker implies that proclaiming the kingdom is a verbal sermon about personal salvation.  Could it be that the gospel of the kingdom encompasses much more than people merely hearing a message or even giving intellectual or emotional assent to it?  It seems that the Kingdom of God that Jesus proclaimed was a call to lordship and discipleship (Matt. 5-7) – the transformation of life, family, clan, and village.  We may be proclaiming less than the gospel of the kingdom, if all we are doing is preaching evangelistic sermons in hopes of representative converts from people groups.

I confidently expect the gospel of the kingdom to be proclaimed in the whole world, and I fervently desire to see the whole church involved in this mission.  At the same time, I believe that our motivation should flow from interpretation that is true to the historical context, as well as the intent and aims of Jesus’ life and ministry.  Rather than appealing to a desire to escape this world, or a desire to make our actions significant, or to fulfill some nebulous aim, shouldn’t we base our motives for mission on Jesus’ summon to love the Lord our God with all our heart and with all our soul and with all our mind and to love our neighbors as ourselves?  May you and I be found loving well when the end does come!